🔗 Share this article

Critics have accused Germany’s chancellor, Friedrich Merz, of employing what they call “risky” discourse regarding immigration, after he supported “massive” deportations of people from urban areas – and asserted that parents of girls would support his position.

Firm Response

The chancellor, who assumed power in May with a pledge to combat the rise of the extremist AfD party, on Monday reprimanded a correspondent who asked whether he wanted to revise his hardline comments on immigration from recently considering extensive condemnation, or say sorry for them.

“I don’t know if you have offspring, and girls among them,” Merz said to the journalist. “Speak with your female children, I suspect you’ll get a pretty loud and clear answer. There is nothing to take back; to the contrary I stress: we must change the situation.”

Political Reaction

Progressive critics alleged that Merz of taking a page from far-right organizations, whose claims that female individuals are being victimized by migrants with assault has become a worldwide extremist slogan.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, criticized the chancellor of having a patronising message for young women that ignored their actual political concerns.

“Perhaps ‘the daughters’ are also displeased with the chancellor only caring about their rights and protection when he can leverage them to justify his completely outdated policies?” she posted on the platform X.

Public Safety Emphasis

Friedrich Merz stated his main focus was “protection in common areas” and highlighted that only when it could be assured “would the established groups regain trust”.

He had drawn flak the previous week for remarks that opponents claimed suggested that diversity itself was a challenge in Germany’s urban centers: “Certainly we continue to have this challenge in the cityscape, and for this reason the interior minister is now striving to facilitate and conduct removals on a extensive basis,” stated during a tour to Brandenburg state near Berlin.

Discrimination Allegations

The leader of the Greens in Brandenburg accused Merz of inciting racial prejudice with his statement, which provoked limited protests in various German cities during the weekend.

“It’s dangerous when ruling parties seek to portray persons as a difficulty due to their physical characteristics or heritage,” remarked.

SPD politician Natalie Pawlik of the Social Democrats, government allies in the current administration, stated: “Migration should not be branded with reductive or populist quick fixes – this fragments the public even further and in the end helps the wrong people rather than encouraging resolutions.”

Electoral Background

The conservative leader’s political alliance achieved a disappointing 28.5 percent performance in the February general election compared to the anti-immigration, anti-Islam AfD with its record 20.8 percent.

Since then, the extremist party has caught up with the Christian Democrats, even overtaking it in certain surveys, in the context of voter fears around migration, lawlessness and economic slowdown.

Background Information

The chancellor rose to the top of his political group vowing a tougher line on immigration than the longtime CDU chancellor Angela Merkel, opposing her “wir schaffen das” motto from the asylum seeker situation a decade ago and attributing to her part of the blame for the AfD’s strength.

He has encouraged an at times more populist tone than the former chancellor, famously attributing fault to “little pashas” for frequent vandalism on New Year’s Eve and asylum seekers for occupying dental visits at the detriment of nationals.

Electoral Preparations

Merz’s party met on recent days to hash out a approach ahead of multiple regional votes during the upcoming year. The AfD has strong leads in several eastern states, approaching a historic 40 percent backing.

Merz insisted that his political group was aligned in preventing collaboration in governance with the Alternative für Deutschland, a stance commonly referred to as the “barrier”.

Internal Dissent

Nonetheless, the recent poll data has spooked some Christian Democrats, prompting a handful of political figures and consultants to suggest in recently that the firewall could be impractical and harmful in the long term.

Those disagreeing argue that as long as the relatively new far-right party, which national intelligence agencies have labelled as far-right, is able to comment without accountability without having to make the hard choices leadership demands, it will benefit from the governing party disadvantage afflicting many democratic nations.

Academic Analysis

Academics in Germany recently found that conventional organizations such as the Christian Democrats were progressively permitting the right-wing to set the agenda, unintentionally normalizing their proposals and circulating them more widely.

While Friedrich Merz resisted using the word “barrier” on Monday, he maintained there were “basic distinctions” with the AfD which would make cooperation unfeasible.

“We accept this obstacle,” he stated. “From now on also show explicitly and directly what the AfD stands for. We will distance ourselves explicitly and unequivocally from them. {Above all