🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has joined the increasing number of performers who voice skepticism about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, explaining she chose not to use their assistance while working on her new movie Die My Love.

Understanding the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo movement to guarantee the security and ease of actors during scenes involving partial undress and sexual content. However, several well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with some claiming they disrupt creative flow.

Jennifer's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while promoting her latest project where she portrays a character experiencing postpartum disturbance, Lawrence stated: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we did have one but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Robert."

She elaborated: "He is not pervy and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. What we discussed mostly revolved around family life and relationships. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or doubts about professional limits."

"If there was even a hint of unease, I would have requested an on-set professional. Numerous male performers take offense if you don't reciprocate their advances, and subsequently the negative treatment begins. Rob was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion

Recently, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged intimacy coordinators as a separate category, together with multiple additional professional roles including dance direction, craft services, and puppet operation. Previously, they were categorized as "miscellaneous staff" instead of having their own designation.

Despite this recognition, intimacy coordinators continue to face media scrutiny implying they might not be industry essential, with high-profile actors rejecting their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier revealed she declined professional supervision while working with Jon Hamm on The Morning Show.

Aniston's Experience

"Jon was such a gentleman – I mean every move, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she recalled. "The scenes were additionally very choreographed. That's the advantage of working with skilled editors, suitable lighting. So, minimal preparation is needed."

Aniston continued, "They offered, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Please, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're seasoned actors – we can handle this. And we had Mimi present."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring numerous scenes of sexual activity and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's acclaimed film about a adult entertainer and a wealthy heir – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star explained she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be best to maintain privacy."

"My character is a sex worker, and I had studied Sean's films and understood his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as part of my job."

Her comments provoked significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, similar to the reaction to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who recently revealed that working on her forthcoming project her latest film represented her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "did not know existed."

Gwyneth's Viewpoint

During filming about personal ease with a specific move alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, the actress responded: "I'm from the era where you get naked, you assume position, the camera's on."

She continued that she and her co-star then told the coordinator: "We think we're comfortable. You can maintain distance.' I can't speak to how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."

Industry Response

Following these comments, former Channel 4 drama head an experienced producer labeled them "concerning" and highlighted that the majority of those speaking against intimacy coordinators have established careers to maintain personal authority and security on production locations.

"Periodically an actor shares opinions about whether they appreciate intimacy coordinators or not," commented the executive. "Gwyneth Paltrow mentioned she came of age in a period when people in Hollywood 'removed clothing and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood working with a actor much younger than her, although likely Chalamet is chill, I considered it somewhat concerning statement."

Actor's Viewpoint

Michael Douglas, in contrast, expressed that he believes the primary responsibility during intimate sequences rests with the male actor, instead of a external professional.

"In my experience, you take responsibility as the male actor to ensure the female co-star is at ease, you talk through completely," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's extremely careful but seems like it's occurring organically, which is hopefully what authentic performance looks like."